Volkswagen Polo 2003 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo 2003 is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo 2003 engine produces 11 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo 2001, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Volkswagen Polo 2001. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo 2003 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2001, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo 2003 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo 2003 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2001. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 2003 and Volkswagen Polo 2001 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 975 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo 2003 has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo 2003 has 25 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo 2001. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo 2003 (by 55 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 1`490 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |