Volkswagen Polo 2003 vs Volkswagen Lupo 2001

 
Volkswagen Polo
2003 - 2005
Volkswagen Lupo
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 86 HP60 HP
Torque: 130 NM116 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.1 seconds14.3 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 26 HP more power than Volkswagen Lupo, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Volkswagen Lupo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.86.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.2 l/100km6.7 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres34 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle540 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway690 km on highway
720 km with real consumption500 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m3.53 m
Width: 1.65 m1.64 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Volkswagen Polo is larger.
Volkswagen Polo is 37 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres130 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres830 litres
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Polo has 140 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 200 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Lupo, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5801`380
Safety:
Quality:
below average

above average
Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Volkswagen Lupo has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv