Volkswagen Polo 2003 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 11 HP more power than Volkswagen Fox, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Volkswagen Fox. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.54 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm longer than the Volkswagen Fox, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1016 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 14 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Fox, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |