Volkswagen Polo 2003 vs Audi A2 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 11 HP more power than Audi A2, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Audi A2. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Audi A2 2000 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Audi A2 2000 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.55 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm longer than the Audi A2, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1085 litres | |
|
Audi A2 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Polo has 120 litres less trunk space than the Audi A2. This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A2 (by 55 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Audi A2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Audi A2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Audi A2, so Audi A2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Audi A2 has
| |