Volkswagen Polo 2002 vs Volkswagen Lupo 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 60 HP | |
Torque: | 126 NM | 116 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 40 HP more power than Volkswagen Lupo, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Volkswagen Lupo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 34 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
810 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
630 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.90 m | 3.53 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Volkswagen Polo is larger. Volkswagen Polo is 37 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 130 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 830 litres | |
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 115 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 145 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Lupo, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`420 | 1`380 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |