Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005

 
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Volkswagen Fox
2005 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP75 HP
Torque: 126 NM124 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.3 seconds13 seconds
Volkswagen Polo and Volkswagen Fox have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 2 NM more than Volkswagen Fox. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.46.7
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Volkswagen Fox is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 600 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
770 km on highway890 km on highway
550 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m3.83 m
Width: 1.65 m1.66 m
Height: 1.46 m1.54 m
Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm longer than the Volkswagen Fox, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 245 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
975 litres1016 litres
Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Polo has 15 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 41 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4901`520
Safety:
Quality:
below average

low
Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Fox, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 14002000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower price
Volkswagen Fox has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv