Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Volkswagen Polo 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo 2001 is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo 2001 engine produces 15 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo 1995, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Volkswagen Polo 1995. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo 2001 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Polo 2001 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 1995, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo 2001 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo 2001 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 1995. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Skoda Fabia, Audi A2 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Polo 2001 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo 2001 is 18 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo 1995, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo 2001 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 975 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo 2001 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo 1995, which means Volkswagen Polo 2001 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`490 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Volkswagen Polo 2001 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo 1995 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo 2001, so Volkswagen Polo 2001 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |