Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Polo and Volkswagen Fox have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 2 NM more than Volkswagen Fox. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.54 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm longer than the Volkswagen Fox, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 1016 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Polo has 15 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`490 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Fox, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |