Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Skoda Fabia 2000

 
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Skoda Fabia
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 65 HP100 HP
Torque: 112 NM126 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.9 seconds11.5 seconds
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 35 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.96.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km6.8 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway840 km on highway
660 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m3.96 m
Width: 1.65 m1.65 m
Height: 1.46 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres1015 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Polo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The Skoda Fabia may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 15 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5501`570
Safety:
Quality:
below average

average
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 12001000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Skoda Fabia has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv