Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 84 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 29 HP less power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Chevrolet Aveo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Polo has 50 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. The Chevrolet Aveo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`530 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |