Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 60 HP more power than Volkswagen Fox, whereas torque is 155 NM more than Volkswagen Fox. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Fox is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.54 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 9 cm longer than the Volkswagen Fox, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1030 litres | 1016 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`750 kg | 1`570 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`150 kg | 1`085 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 600 kg | 485 kg | |
| Volkswagen Polo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Volkswagen Fox. Therefore, Volkswagen Polo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |