Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Fox, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volkswagen Fox. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.54 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 9 cm longer than the Volkswagen Fox, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1030 litres | 1016 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`650 kg | 1`570 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`095 kg | 1`085 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 555 kg | 485 kg | |
| Volkswagen Polo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Volkswagen Fox. Therefore, Volkswagen Polo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |