Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Polo and Volkswagen Fox have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.54 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 9 cm longer than the Volkswagen Fox, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1016 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 14 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |