Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005

 
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2006
Volkswagen Fox
2005 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 85 HP75 HP
Torque: 130 NM124 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.1 seconds13 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Fox, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Volkswagen Fox. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.86.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway890 km on highway
700 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.83 m
Width: 1.65 m1.66 m
Height: 1.47 m1.54 m
Volkswagen Polo is 9 cm longer than the Volkswagen Fox, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres1016 litres
Volkswagen Polo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 14 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6501`520
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 18002000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv