Volkswagen Polo 2006 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 84 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 4 HP less power than Chevrolet Aveo, but torque is 18 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Despite less power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Aveo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo and Chevrolet Aveo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 50 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`455 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |