Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Honda Jazz 2008

 
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2009
Honda Jazz
2008 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 55 HP90 HP
Torque: 108 NM114 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.5 seconds12.6 seconds
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 35 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.8no data
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres42 litres
640 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.90 m
Width: 1.65 m1.70 m
Height: 1.47 m1.53 m
Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres428 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres1396 litres
Honda Jazz has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Polo has 158 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 366 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`420
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

high
Honda Jazz has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 24004000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower price
Honda Jazz has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv