Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Volkswagen Golf 2008

 
Volkswagen Polo
2009 - 2014
Volkswagen Golf
2008 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP110 HP
Torque: 230 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11 seconds
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Golf.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.35.3
Real fuel consumption: 5.2 l/100km6.4 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1040 km in combined cycle1030 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway1240 km on highway
860 km with real consumption850 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.97 m4.20 m
Width: 1.68 m1.79 m
Height: 1.49 m1.48 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volkswagen Polo is 23 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 11 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 280 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
952 litres1305 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 70 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 353 litres).
Turning diameter: no data11 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`910
Safety:
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 44004200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv