Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Seat Ibiza 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Polo and Seat Ibiza have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.2 | |
| Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Polo is 8 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 938 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 12 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 14 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`621 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |