Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 5 HP more power than Volkswagen Fox, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volkswagen Fox. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is larger, but lower. Volkswagen Polo is 14 cm longer than the Volkswagen Fox, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1016 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 20 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 64 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |