Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Volkswagen Golf 2008

 
Volkswagen Polo
2009 - 2014
Volkswagen Golf
2008 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 85 HP122 HP
Torque: 132 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds9.5 seconds
Volkswagen Golf is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 37 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 68 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.86.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.7 l/100km7.0 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway1100 km on highway
670 km with real consumption780 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.97 m4.20 m
Width: 1.68 m1.79 m
Height: 1.49 m1.48 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volkswagen Polo is 23 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 11 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 280 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
952 litres1305 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 70 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 353 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5501`850
Safety:
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 44004400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv