Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Suzuki Splash 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Polo engine produces 9 HP less power than Suzuki Splash. Despite less power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Splash, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Splash. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is larger, but lower. Volkswagen Polo is 20 cm longer than the Suzuki Splash, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 178 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 573 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 102 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Splash. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 379 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 1.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Splash, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Suzuki Splash has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Suzuki Splash, so Suzuki Splash quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Suzuki Splash has
| |