Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Polo engine produces 10 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, but torque is 7 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Despite less power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.55 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1032 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 60 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 80 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |