Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Ford Fiesta 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Fiesta is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford Fiesta, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Ford Fiesta. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 295 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Polo has 15 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Fiesta scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Fiesta, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |