Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Opel Corsa 2006

 
Volkswagen Polo
2009 - 2014
Opel Corsa
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.2 Diesel
Petrol engines (Volkswagen Polo) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Opel Corsa) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.

Performance

Power: 70 HP90 HP
Torque: 112 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.1 seconds13 seconds
Opel Corsa is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 20 HP less power than Opel Corsa, whereas torque is 88 NM less than Opel Corsa. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.54.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km5.3 l/100km
The Opel Corsa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Corsa, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Corsa.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1090 km on highway
690 km with real consumption840 km with real consumption
Opel Corsa gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.97 m4.00 m
Width: 1.68 m1.71 m
Height: 1.49 m1.49 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Corsa, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 280 litres285 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
952 litres1100 litres
Volkswagen Polo has 5 litres less trunk space than the Opel Corsa. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Corsa (by 148 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`5501`675
Safety:
Quality:
above average

average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Corsa has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better
Average price (€): 34001800
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • fewer faults
Opel Corsa has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv