Volkswagen Polo 2017 vs Skoda Fabia 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Volkswagen Polo is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Skoda Fabia can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | 1.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 65 - 272 HP | 75 - 110 HP | |
Torque: | 95 - 400 NM | 95 - 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.1 - 15.5 seconds | 9.6 - 14.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.1 - 5.9 | 4.6 - 4.8 | |
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.05 m | 4.00 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 330 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1125 litres | no data | |
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 21 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`668 | ~ 1`581 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Average price (€): | 8400 | 13 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |