Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 55 - 100 HP | 55 - 180 HP | |
Torque: | 106 - 240 NM | 108 - 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 17.5 seconds | 7.5 - 17.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.4 | 4.4 - 7.9 | |
Volkswagen Polo 2001 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo 2005. On average, a Volkswagen Polo 2001 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volkswagen Polo 2005. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.90 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 2001 is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo 2005, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo 2001 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1030 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`530 | ~ 1`663 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |