Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Skoda Fabia 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Skoda Fabia
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.91.0 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 55 - 100 HP50 - 130 HP
Torque: 106 - 240 NM84 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 - 17.5 seconds9.6 - 20.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.5 - 7.44.5 - 7.8
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m3.96 m
Width: 1.65 m1.65 m
Height: 1.46 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres1016 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Polo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The Skoda Fabia may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 14 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`530~ 1`579
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 16001000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
Skoda Fabia has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv