Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Skoda Fabia 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 55 - 100 HP | 50 - 130 HP | |
Torque: | 106 - 240 NM | 84 - 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 17.5 seconds | 9.6 - 20.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.4 | 4.5 - 7.8 | |
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.90 m | 3.96 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 260 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1016 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Polo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The Skoda Fabia may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 14 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`530 | ~ 1`579 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |