Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Seat Ibiza 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 - 100 HP | 64 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 - 240 NM | 112 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 17.5 seconds | 8.4 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.4 | 4.7 - 7.9 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Ibiza. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Polo is 5 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 5 litres more trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`530 | ~ 1`648 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |