Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Suzuki Swift 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volkswagen Polo is available only with front wheel drive, while Suzuki Swift can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 - 180 HP | 70 - 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 310 NM | 116 - 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 17.5 seconds | 10 - 14.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.9 | 4.6 - 6.5 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Swift. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.51 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 22 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 213 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 562 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 57 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 468 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 1.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`663 | ~ 1`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |