Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Skoda Fabia 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2009
Skoda Fabia
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.91.2 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 55 - 180 HP54 - 130 HP
Torque: 108 - 310 NM106 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.5 - 17.5 seconds9.5 - 18.4 seconds
In general, Volkswagen Polo are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Skoda Fabia. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 7.94.5 - 7.8
On average, the Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Skoda Fabia. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.96 m
Width: 1.65 m1.65 m
Height: 1.47 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1030 litres1016 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia.
Gross weight: ~ 1`663 kg~ 1`647 kg
Net weight:~ 1`102 kg~ 1`105 kg
Load capacity:~ 561 kg~ 542 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 18001200
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 7.7/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
Skoda Fabia has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv