Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Ford Fiesta 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2009
Ford Fiesta
2005 - 2008
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.91.3 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 55 - 180 HP68 - 150 HP
Torque: 108 - 310 NM106 - 204 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.5 - 17.5 seconds8.4 - 17.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 7.94.3 - 7.4
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.92 m
Width: 1.65 m1.68 m
Height: 1.47 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo and Ford Fiesta are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres284 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres947 litres
Volkswagen Polo has 14 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 83 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`663~ 1`562
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 24001600
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 7.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Ford Fiesta has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv