Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Ford Fiesta 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 55 - 180 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 108 - 310 NM | 106 - 204 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 17.5 seconds | 8.4 - 17.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.9 | 4.3 - 7.4 | |
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo and Ford Fiesta are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 284 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 947 litres | |
Volkswagen Polo has 14 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 83 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`663 | ~ 1`562 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |