Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Renault Clio 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 - 180 HP | 60 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 310 NM | 93 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 17.5 seconds | 8.5 - 15.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.9 | 4.3 - 7.9 | |
|
On average, the Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Renault Clio. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1030 litres | 1035 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 18 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`663 kg | ~ 1`656 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`102 kg | ~ 1`159 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 561 kg | ~ 497 kg | |
| Volkswagen Polo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Renault Clio. Therefore, Volkswagen Polo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Renault Clio has
| |