Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 180 HP | 60 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 250 NM | 108 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 16.1 seconds | 10.4 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.3 - 5.9 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
On average, the Volkswagen Polo 2009 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Volkswagen Polo 2009. On average, Volkswagen Polo 2009 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2009. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 2009 and Volkswagen Polo 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`597 | ~ 1`570 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 6.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |