Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 180 HP | 60 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 250 NM | 108 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 16.1 seconds | 7.3 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.3 - 5.9 | 3.8 - 7.5 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 315 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 35 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`597 | ~ 1`626 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Polo is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |