Volkswagen Polo 2014 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.4 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 150 HP | 60 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 250 NM | 108 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 15.5 seconds | 10.4 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 4.9 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo 2014 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo 2009. On average, Volkswagen Polo 2014 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2009. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 2014 and Volkswagen Polo 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`631 | ~ 1`570 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Polo 2009 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.5/10 | 6.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |