Volkswagen Polo 2014 vs Ford Focus 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.4 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 150 HP | 105 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 250 NM | 150 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 15.5 seconds | 8.9 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 4.9 | 5.0 - 6.4 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Focus. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 39 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 277 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | no data | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 3 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`631 | ~ 1`938 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Ford Focus has
| |