Volkswagen Polo 2014 vs Seat Ibiza 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.4 | 1.0 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 150 HP | 75 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 250 NM | 95 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 15.5 seconds | 7.6 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 4.9 | 3.4 - 5.2 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Ibiza. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 9 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | no data | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 12 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`631 | ~ 1`609 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |