Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Volkswagen Polo 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.0 - 1.9 | |
| Power: | 60 - 100 HP | 50 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 202 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | 8.7 - 18.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 9.0 | 4.4 - 7.5 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo 1996 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo 1999. On average, a Volkswagen Polo 1996 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volkswagen Polo 1999. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo 1996 is 40 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo 1999, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo 1996 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo 1996 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo 1999, which means Volkswagen Polo 1996 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 933 | ~ 785 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
| |