Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Toyota Corolla 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Polo
1996 - 1999
Toyota Corolla
2004 - 2007
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 1.91.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 60 - 100 HP90 - 225 HP
Torque: 116 - 202 NM130 - 280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 - 16.9 seconds6.8 - 14.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.9 - 9.04.8 - 9.0
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.19 m
Width: 1.64 m1.71 m
Height: 1.41 m1.48 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 5 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres310 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
762 litresno data
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Polo has 145 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. The Toyota Corolla may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`501~ 1`238
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 6001800
Rating in user reviews: 7.2/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Toyota Corolla has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv