Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Ford Escort 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 100 HP | 60 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 202 NM | 109 - 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | 10.9 - 17.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 9.0 | 5.9 - 8.9 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Escort. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Polo is 15 cm shorter than the Ford Escort, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
762 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford Escort, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`501 | ~ 1`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Ford Escort has
| |