Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Volkswagen Vento 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 100 HP | 60 - 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 202 NM | 116 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | 8 - 18.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 9.0 | 5.0 - 11.6 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Vento. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 24 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Vento, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
762 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Vento. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`501 | ~ 1`167 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 6.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |