Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Seat Cordoba 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 100 HP | 60 - 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 202 NM | 116 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | 10.1 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 9.0 | 4.9 - 9.2 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Cordoba. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo and Seat Cordoba are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
762 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.9 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`501 | ~ 965 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |