Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Peugeot 306 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 - 100 HP | 70 - 112 HP | |
Torque: | 116 - 202 NM | 111 - 205 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | 10.3 - 17.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 9.0 | 5.2 - 8.3 | |
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 306. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.14 m | 4.27 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Polo is 13 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 463 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
762 litres | no data | |
Volkswagen Polo has 8 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`501 | ~ 1`538 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |