Volkswagen Polo 2010 vs Toyota Camry 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 | 2.4 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 105 HP | 147 - 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 153 NM | 187 - 346 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 12.1 seconds | 6.8 - 9.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 7.0 | 6.9 - 9.9 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Camry. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 43 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 535 litres | |
|
Toyota Camry has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 75 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Camry. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Camry. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`673 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |