Volkswagen Polo 2010 vs Kia RIO 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 | 1.4 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 105 HP | 107 - 123 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 153 NM | 135 - 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 12.1 seconds | 10.3 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 7.0 | 5.9 - 6.4 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia RIO. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm longer than the Kia RIO, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Polo has 40 litres less trunk space than the Kia RIO. This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`673 | ~ 1`565 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Kia RIO has
| |