Volkswagen Polo 2010 vs Kia Ceed 2007

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Polo
2010 - 2015
Kia Ceed
2007 - 2009
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 (petrol)1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 85 - 105 HP90 - 143 HP
Torque: 145 - 153 NM137 - 305 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 - 12.1 seconds10.5 - 14.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.5 - 7.04.9 - 7.7
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Ceed.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.47 m
Width: 1.70 m1.79 m
Height: 1.47 m1.53 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 9 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres534 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1664 litres
Kia Ceed has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 74 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed.
Turning diameter: 10.8 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`673~ 1`885
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

below average
Average price (€): 46002600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Kia Ceed has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv