Volkswagen Polo 2010 vs Kia Ceed 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.6 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 85 - 105 HP | 90 - 143 HP | |
Torque: | 145 - 153 NM | 137 - 305 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 12.1 seconds | 10.5 - 14.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 7.0 | 4.9 - 7.7 | |
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Ceed. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.53 m | |
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 9 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 534 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1664 litres | |
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 74 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`673 | ~ 1`885 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |