Volkswagen Polo 2010 vs Honda Civic 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 | 1.3 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 105 HP | 95 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 153 NM | 123 - 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 12.1 seconds | 9.1 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 7.0 | 4.6 - 7.1 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Polo is 11 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1190 litres | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 25 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda Civic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`673 | ~ 1`679 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.0/10 | 9.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Honda Civic has
| |