Volkswagen Polo 2014 vs Toyota Corolla 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 125 HP | 90 - 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 155 NM | 130 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 12.1 seconds | 10.2 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 7.0 | 5.7 - 7.8 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 473 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Polo has 13 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`690 | ~ 1`676 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.5/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |