Volkswagen Polo 2014 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 125 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 155 NM | 95 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 12.1 seconds | 9.4 - 15.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 7.0 | 3.4 - 4.8 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 40 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 130 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`690 | ~ 1`585 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |