Volkswagen Polo 2014 vs Ford Fiesta 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 125 HP | 65 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 155 NM | 150 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 12.1 seconds | 9.4 - 16.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 7.0 | 3.3 - 5.9 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 44 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 295 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 165 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`690 | ~ 1`506 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Fiesta is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |